Thursday, June 11, 2009

UPDATED: Social Entropy

Social Entropy

All systems in the universe approach a state of total chaos. In this vein of thinking, the very function of civilization is to keep the human species from dissolving into chaos. Can you imagine what the world would be like with six billion people and no laws or social customs? In order to prevent this anarchistic state, a very small minority of people carve out the tenets of society through cultural customs, religion, and judicial processes. However, the actual execution of these rules has a two-fold effect.

The first effect of this social organization is that of bringing people together harmoniously. As examples, charity work and life-saving medical research, which may seem unrelated, are actually the offspring of well-intentioned individuals who were organized into a group and thus able to pool their efforts and maximize their effectiveness. This is the boon of ordered structures of social interactions. However, this positive effect is overshadowed by the dark side of organized society.

People collaborating their efforts in large groups with little control over one another can be a very fruitful experience. However, inevitably in all types of civilizations, which are truly crafted and controlled by a global ruling class, the common person follows social rules and examples for no better reason other than the fact that they exist. This sheep-like activity allows the ruling class to exploit and abuse the masses with little to no consequence.

The ruling classes of various countries have developed methods to quell any retribution for their self-serving behavior. For instance, in the United States, the “American Dream” is an indoctrination tool whereby people are told that if they work hard and apply themselves, they actually have a chance of becoming rich and prosperous and able to control their own destiny. Thus, generation after generation, the American working class plods along in unrewarding and degrading jobs, allowing the economic elites to ravage the country and economy. The working class allows this behavior of the ruling class because, in their ignorance, they believe that it is acceptable to desire and have those privileges for themselves once they rise through the ranks of society. In less-developed and smaller nations, such as certain countries in Africa, a military dictatorship is sufficient to allow a small group of people to exploit the citizens of the controlled nation.

A most poignant observation, upon accepting this view of human society, is that capitalism as it is practiced today belongs on the dark side of social entropy. The very idea of most of the wealth in a society being controlled by a minority of its members is categorically at odds with a morally justifiable view of the world, unless every member of the society has an equal opportunity to gain a fair share of said wealth. In order to allow every person an equal chance to gain a level of wealth that is proportionate to their contribution to society, several things must occur.

The first necessary change, the change from which all the other changes necessarily flow, is to provide all human beings with free access to high-quality education.

The second necessary change to society is the abandonment of categorizations for people. For instance, the idea of separating people by race, religion, nationality, physical attributes, mental ability, or any other similar factors must be overcome in our society. Until we no longer judge a person by any qualities that he or she cannot control, we cannot legitimately consider ourselves to be magnanimous.

The third necessary change is to end all inheritance of wealth in any form. The purpose of capitalism is to allow members of society to gain a share of wealth that is relative to their motivation and ingenuity. If we allow wealth to be passed down through generations, it negates the point of capitalism. Inheritance allows a person to gain wealth without making a proportionate contribution to society. In addition, all living people should be given equally strong motivation to strive for human progress. Any members of society who inherit wealth are arguably no longer motivated to make progressive achievements in any field of human endeavor, because they are no longer forced to earn their own living. How many important discoveries or inventions have been made by somebody who inherited a trust fund?

The fourth necessary change is place a legal limit on the size of corporations. There are several problems that result from over-sized corporations, the first being that as a company grows, the more ruthless and destructive it must become, due to the relatively static nature of a large organization. Larger companies find it more difficult to responsibly compete in a dynamic global economy. Therefore, they instead attempt to alter the market, through political channels, to fit their own situation. For an example, consider oil companies. Due to the unsustainable nature of a petroleum-based economy, as well as increasing concern over climate change, these companies are headed for a major downsizing, if not total failure. However, they artificially increase their own longevity, usually by military intervention in an oil-rich country (for instance, both Gulf wars). These interventions cause a massive and widespread deregulation of business activities in the affected regions, allowing the piracy of natural resources. Instead of the market pushing companies towards the long-term financial sustainability of renewable energy technology, the oil companies distort the market to prefer the short-term, high-risk profitability contained within petroleum-based economic activity. The other problem with over-sized corporations is that their very existence is a threat to the stability of the overall economy. With too many resources tied up in any one company, the failure of said company can cause a massive recession. The current global downturn is proof-positive that the failure of a handful of over-sized companies can depress the entire world’s economy.

As soon as we implement these changes, societal progress will be boundless. The distribution of wealth in the world will become more just, and discrimination will end. For the first time in history, we could be proud to be members of the human race.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Epic Fail of the Day

Earlier, I picked up my dad from the train station. He told me about how he was listening to conservative radio host Mark Levin. He listens to him for laughs. Anyways, the guy was complaining about how he is highly taxed on his property, which is on a golf course. He also complained and ranted about golfers going near his house with golf carts, and golf balls hitting windows. The things is, I don't know why this guy uses his head if he thinks he's a genius. First of all, you're taxed highly because you're living on a golf course, which is usually an upper-class place to live. Second of all, if you don't want people walking around your property, and golf balls hitting your house...DON'T LIVE ON A GOLF COURSE!!! Don't complain about liberals and taxes if you yourself don't use any intellect. Epic Fail.

Sunday, May 31, 2009

Epic Fail of the Decade

Invade Iraq......no weapons of mass destruction found.
North Korea's leader is certifiably insane and possesses nuclear weapons.......six party talks.

Epic Fail of the Decade.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Epic Fail of the Day

Epic fail of the day may be a continuing segment, so we'll see how it goes. Today I was listening to the Yankee game on the radio in my car, and a Fox News commercial came on. It said that Fox News is "the most unbiased, balanced news in America."

EPIC FAIL

Imagine that McCain and Palin won in '08....

Imagine also that there exists a global media which mirrors the style of national news outlets in today’s America. One of the sentences scrolling by at the bottom of the screen would be: “The United States invades Mexico because it claims swine flu as a terrorist plot to destroy capitalism.”

Monday, March 2, 2009

The State of Heavy Music Today: Prog is the Key

3/2/09


The state of popular music, especially Heavy Metal since 1990 is an interesting topic. Popular rock music shifted from metal to grunge to alternative, to nu-metal to emo/hardcore to indie rock. Heavy metal never went away, except from the mainstream. In fact, incredible bands have come out since the early 90’s. The thing that makes this topic interesting is that it has become much more difficult to find good bands that are worth your listening time. The 1980’s saw some of the greatest heavy metal bands of all time, including Metallica, Iron Maiden, Megadeth, Judas Priest, Guns N’ Roses, and countless others. However, heavy metal fell out of mainstream popularity in the early 1990’s. Pantera was probably the most popular metal band of the 90’s, other than Metallica. Guns N’ Roses’ classic lineup officially ended in the mid-90’s, and Iron Maiden and Judas Priest both went through various lineup changes throughout the 90’s. So, the 1990’s were a very strange time for most heavy bands.

I got into heavy music in the ninth grade. Most of the bands I listened to then were from the classic era of the eighties, such as: Metallica, Guns N’ Roses, and Megadeth. The next year I got into Iron Maiden and Nevermore. This was also around the time when I started looking at heavy bands since 1990. At first I was pretty reluctant to look at new bands, because I had a mentality that bands that weren’t from the 80’s weren’t as good. However I finally got past that and found some good bands. I didn’t end up listening to all of these bands for long though. At the time I looked for bands that had a similar style as Metallica. Some of the bands I found were considered part of the “New Wave of American Metal”. Among these bands were Lamb of God, Shadows Fall, and Killswitch Engage. I found all these bands in the same year; however I only listen to Lamb of God now. Shadows Fall and Killswitch were pretty good then, but they didn’t continue with a consistent output of good records. Another thing with these bands is that they aren’t that innovative.

Lamb of God on the other hand, has gotten better, and is an innovative band. They’re a band that is heavily influenced by the thrash metal genre, which is why I took to them in the first place. However, they aren’t an 80’s thrash copy. All the members of the band are incredibly gifted musicians, and some of the best in the genre. All the albums in their catalogue are extremely important and significant to the scene, especially As the Palaces Burn. They just released their new album Wrath last week, which I argue is their best record to date. They refined their sound, while adding new textures and influences to the mix. It’s a furious record, pounding the listener with its speed and crushing heavy metal. Lamb of God proves to be the best band of the “New Wave of American Metal” due to the fact that they have stayed consistent, even improving, not to mention their new take on a classic heavy metal sound.

Nevermore is one of the most unique metal bands I’ve ever heard. They combine a number of influences, as well as an operatic vocal style. Hardly any singers sound like Warrel Dane, which is one of the reasons I like them so much. Like the members of Lamb of God, Nevermore showcases virtuoso musicians. Jeff Loomis is an extremely underrated guitarist, and in my opinion, one of the best in the business. He is a shredder in every sense; however he sets himself apart by remarkable songwriting skills. He can solo with the best of them, as well as writing some of the most complicated and heavy riffs you’ll ever hear. All of their records are very good, with a special spotlight on Dead Heart in a Dead World and This Godless Endeavor.

Mastodon is a band I’ve only recently really gotten into. I’ve heard their stuff going back to tenth grade or so, but due to their progressive nature, didn’t catch on until a few months ago. I got Blood Mountain when it came out and liked it, but started really liking it a few months ago. They have an extremely interesting sound, mixing Sludge Metal with Thrash. This mix in influences, as well and their progressive songs, make them an extremely significant band in the scene. Their new album, Crack the Skye is set to be released at the end of this month, which puts them in a position to become an even bigger band.

Like Mastodon, Sweden’s Opeth is another band that took me a while to get into. Opeth is even more progressive than Mastodon. They are, in some ways, Heavy Metal’s Pink Floyd. There are a massive amount of influences in this band, among Latin music, jazz, Scandinavian music, and various heavy metal influences. Michael Akerfeldt, the front man of the band, is a virtuoso in his own right, as a songwriter, guitarist, and as a vocalist. I first listened to their landmark album, Blackwater Park, which was my favorite of theirs for years. However as my friend Matt always told me, they’re an interesting band because fans’ favorite album switches every so often. This ended up being true for me, because Ghost Reveries is now my favorite Opeth Record. It’s the perfect blend of great songs, and great production. Overall, Opeth is an absolutely amazing band with a great catalogue. Their records are very varied from each other, and I’ve yet to hear a bad record by them. One of the best things about them is the way they blend heavy and soft sections, going from a brutal riff to a beautiful mellow section. Akerfeldt is a great example of this, mixing heavy and soft vocals at a whim, and being masterful at both styles. Opeth continues to be one of the best metal bands around.

Lamb of God, Nevermore, Mastodon, and Opeth are only some of the big metal bands since the 1990’s. However, they are some of the absolute best, as well as my favorites. I recently realized why they have gained success, and why I like all four of these bands. This is because of the progressive nature of all four bands. All of these bands have done something new with their music, and didn’t just put out records that sound like the classic bands. They all write their music with progressive riffs, song structures, drumming and baselines. There is nothing standard about all their records. They all play extremely difficult music musicianship-wise, and are constantly pushing the envelope with their music, like progressive bands before them. There are bands around today that are pretty big, but I would argue that they won’t be around long, due to the fact that they’re not doing anything particularly new or unique. The above bands are also great due to the fact that they are all great live. Being a good live band, to me, is the true test of a good band. If you can’t play your music live, there isn’t much of a point. This is an interesting time for the heavy metal genre. Metallica and Guns N’ Roses have recently released albums which are both very good, and Judas Priest and Iron Maiden have reformed their classic lineups. These rebirths, in combination with the new generation of great metal bands, make this current era very interesting. You can see these bands, old and new tour together, making for amazing concert experiences. It isn’t the eighties, but it’s a great time for heavy metal.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Album Review: The Itals - Brutal Out Deh (1982)

...........I'm laying next to a beautiful Jamaican woman. We're in a hammock strung between two palm trees, on a beach somewhere in the Caribbean. It's a Friday afternoon in August, around 7, and we're sharing a blunt and drinking margaritas. The sun is hanging lazily in the sky; only a few hours before it sets over the ocean. The rhythm of the waves washing gently onto the sand only 20 feet away is soothing, hypnotic.........

All you need to know about this album is that it would perfectly complement the above scene.